Arthur Miller’s †The Crucible Essay

In 1953 Arthur miller wrote a fill entit lead The Crucible, by writing this he aimed to ch every last(predicate)enge the assumptions of US society and led population to question each others responsibilities. In the 1950s senator Joe McCarthy toss offed to exploit the US fears of communism and organised a witch hunt. miller would have seen this as similar to the final solution in the sense that people were universe wrongly criminate of being witches when they were not. Arthur was a Jew and so would have had sympathy with these people and this in my eyes was angiotensin-converting enzyme of the chance upon factors in the writing of this play. During the 17th degree centigrade t present was an outbreak in the view of witchery in Europe.This led to kettle of fish immigration from Europe to America the immigrants were Puritans and so set up their own rigorous Christian communities. This is how capital of Oregon, Massachusetts came into being. Millers characters convey my p oint through and through their adjustment of personality from mould I through to Act IV. There are incompatible types of change throughout the play such as change in character, beliefs and allegiance and these all occur at some(prenominal) point in the play to contrasting characters.Proctor, a sodbuster, goes from a local, well view man to a man accused of being in contact with the Devil. Abigail transforms from brisk and beautiful to malicious and evil. ram on the other hand is bought into the play as a witchcraft expert, he ends up struggling with this particular grimace and so changes into a frail, old and wakeful man. Putnam is overlots like Proctor and his stratum throughout the play is much the aforesaid(prenominal) and ultimately ends in death.The graduation condemnation Putnam is mentioned he is said to be vindictive, meaning he is sly and malicious. but there is a reason for this character of his Miller does say that Thomas Putnam is a man with many griev ances. This quote only when says that his vindictive nature effs later a certain event in his life, this being that James Bailey (his son in law) had been false down as minister of Salem. and this changes completely as the accusations of witchcraft come out from the woodwork, instead of being marred by this grievance he turns to his dogmatic self. During Act I the Putnam family cry witchcraft on a certain Rebecca suck this is all Thomas Putnams vary ego. The keeps were the ones who ultimately prevented James Bailey from taking mathematical function in Salem and for Putnam, blackening the Nurse name would surely open the accession for Bailey to become minister of Salem.So, at the start of the play Putnam is portrayed as the accuser, and right so. moreover as we go on through the play we see Putnams character change somewhat rapidly from the accuser to the accused. This is proven correct when in Act III Danforth says, Mr Putnam, I have here an accusation by Mr Corey aga inst you. This accusation unsocial shows how Putnams personality has changed from one peak to the other he has gone from accuser to the accused. This mental capacity on Thomas Putnam goes someway to describing how the all in all ordeal in Salem has changed everyone and is bigger direct than ever before. This shocks the audience as it shows that this whole ordeal in Salem is changing even the most in effect(p) of men.The next character we see is rarified drag out he is brought in by Parris as a master of the talismanic arts, witchcraft. We are first introduced to compress as, Mr coerce is nearing forty, a tight-skinned, eager-eyed intellectual. This makes the audience recall straight away that Hale is a well respected and well educate individual who is very contempt with his job, to the intent he actually enjoys it. Miller set forth Hale as someone who, mat up the pride.This shows Hale took pride in the fact he was sought after and good at his job, and a specialist i n such areas. So, from how Miller describes Hale we see his willingness to be knobbed with this salute of justice and eager to show off his ability, as this improves his self esteem.. So it would be late to assume that Hale would be a figurehead for the farther Acts in the play, this is full-strength to some extent, until Act III where Hale ultimately loses his head he realises how much this case has affected Salem and its citizens, I denounce these proceedings, I quit this court.This quote itself lets the audience know how much the situation in Salem has short-winded up into something that never should have been. How it has all spurred from one accusation to a further ten, then at the end, over one hundred. It shows the audience how the situation has affected so many people and that Hale is the first to realise this. He, as a result, discontinue the court, this giving evidence to the statement that Hales personality has completely changed. At first he wants to be involved (the hero) and take pride in his work.But now, n Act III he gets as far away from the case as possible, it shows how the situation is changing people, and more so how it has changed Reverend Hale. Hale is now portrayed as a weak, crestfallen individual, lacking in personality. He goes from watertight to frail and deflated. The audience watching this would life confused at seeing this theme change in this holy honourable figure.Possibly the most important ambassador for change in The Crucible is potty Proctor. We are first introduced to him during Act I, Miller describes John Proctor as, a farmer in his middle thirties. He get hold of not have been a backer of any faction in the town