The medical model emphasizes exclusively

The medical moulding emphasizes exclusively on treating specific material diseases and concerned with resolving wellness problems and does not emphasize prevention. The holistic model of health is defined by the 1947 WHO definition as a enunciate of complete physical, mental and fond public assistance and not merely the absence seizure of disease or infirmity. The holistic model integrates the medical model persuasion and also introduced the idea of positive health.The social epidemiologic model of health focus on individual level measures, or on sudden social properties that have no correlation at the individual level.The social epidemiologic model overlaps with social sciences like medical sociology and medical geographics (Krieger 2002, p. 698).(2. )The debate between alternative and conventional medicines can be rather convincing but leaves those who are not aware of this issue to be either dangerously ignorant or confused. Thus, the impact of science on the rise of conv entional (AMA) medicine put at stake human beings health and human lives. According to the American Medical Association, the fourth leadership cause of death in America is the use of prescription drugs.It accounts for reactions to drugs that were by rights prescribed and reported cases. Thus, the exact and precise figure is undoubtedly far worse.(3. ) The main difference between current and alternative traditional progresses is that the modern approach focuses on the cause of the ailment (Magar 2009). The modern approach concentrates on factors causing the disease, remedies and deal with abnormality as an independent entity. The alternative approach often opposes evidence-based practice and including therapies with an historical or cultural basis, but not scientific basis.(4. ) The health lifestyles can yield an impact on the lives of individuals. Thus, the wellness lifestyles can be made into a sociological belief assumption that there is a rising interest in health, fitne ss and well-being as an individual concern and a parallel concern of organizations, communities and nations (Schuster et al. 2004, p. 357-367).(5. ) Cassidy (1995) notes that the dickens paradigms namely reductionism (used by bioscientists) and holism (used by alternative healthcare) are antipathetic to the ways of biomedicine and CAM.This distinction relates to problems in CAM because the two paradigms reflect two disparate ways of constructing reality in the society. Thus, the integration of CAM into medicine results to therapies of CAM adopted by medicine without the needed philosophical elements.(6. ) RCT has an issue of internal grimness versus outer validity. Most RCT designs have high validity based on reductionist scientific paradigm but have low external validity due to misrepresentation of the holistic essence of homeopathy. Homeopathy is a habitual form of alternative medicine.(7. ) The choice of outcome measures should match the CAM intervention by matching the des ired outcomes of the key participants and its validity in terms of measure what it intends to measure in the study as a form of calibre assurance.(8. ) The limitation of RCT is that it lacks qualitative measurement of data (Verhoef, 2002). The limitations of RCT with regard to research on CAM are that it is ineffective in shielding more than one meditation and is an inappropriate model to evaluate the effectiveness of homeopathy.(9.) The outcome research in CAM can have another alternative to RCT when research uses randomized controlled trials to test in efficacy of the medicines used in homeopathy.(10. ) The most important concept I learned from writing this paper is that models of health greatly differ from each other in terms of their respective approaches and goals. The difference of the models of health possesses the same subject of either conventional or alternative medicines. workings Cited Krieger N. A glossary for social epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health. Oct 20 0155(10)693-700. Reprinted in epidemiological Bulletin, Vol. 23 No. 1, March 2002