Character study on Inspecter Calls by J.B Priestly :: essays research papers

AT THE END OF MOST PLAY, SOME CHARACTERS score CHANGED AND SOME HAVE NOT. DISCUSS TWO CHARCTERS ONE WHO CHANGES, AND ONE WHO DOESNT IN THE PLAY CALLED AN INSPECTOR CALLS BY J.B. PRIESTLYThe play An examiner Calls by J.B Priestly, is set on an April evening in 1912. The play concerns the logrolling family and Gerald Croft quietly celebrating over Gerald and (Mr. birlings daughter) Sheila rotates engagement, when an tester arrives unexpectedly amidst their family celebration to enquire about a suicide of a young pregnant girl called, Eva Smith.Through questioning, the tester uncovers that they all book some kind of an involvement to the young girls death. In the play, some characters are changed by the testers arrival and news. about however, remain the same.One character who remains the same is Mrs Birling. In make for One, we are given a general impression of her a polite woman but one who knows her power of authority ( universe the wife of a well-off businessman and the chairwoman of Brumley Womens Charitable Society). In scrap Two, Mrs. Birling introduces herself in a polite and respectable manner to the inspector (quite unlike the character that she progresses into) but he finds it hard to get info out of Mrs. Birling, this can be shown with the these quotes (taken from just after the Inspector has shown Mrs. Birling a photograph of Eva)(Inspector) You recognise her?(Mrs Birling) No. Why should I? afterward in the play, the truth comes out that Mrs Birling had met the girl in the photo.Sheila back up the Inspector when Mrs Birling wouldnt give out any data about Eva and tried to persuade her mother to talk but Mrs Birling took her as being rude and insolent and showed that she doesnt like being contradicted. When Mrs Birling does tell the Inspector about Eva coming to her committee for help, she showed no remorse for the young girl. She took Eva as being impertinent when Eva said that her break was Mrs Birling and was prejudiced against her case. Therefore, she used her power and authority (as being the chairwoman) to bias the others on the committee to abandon her case. Mrs Birling tried to reason with the Inspector about her judgments of Eva and with a clear conscience she said she was, . . . perfectly reassert in advising my committee not to allow her claim for assistance.