Critical Thinking Part

Application and Critical Thinking Most abomination labs In the U. S. Are funded & operated by the gobo and provide services free to constabulary and prosecutors. Great Britain uses snobby labs that charge a fee for services and keeps both profits they make. What argon some potential strengths and fosterlessnesses of each system? one and only(a) potential strength for the U. S. For being funded and operated by the gobo and providing free services for the legal philosophy and prosecutors Is that they do non have to worry about funds.The police and/or prosecutors can approach the shame labs they deed and ask for which ever tests they hire to be performed and get them done, how ever m whatsoever clocks. A potential weakness of this system could be that the information could be skewed being that it is test by one particular agency, a nonher weakness is that the gobo isnt making any money like the agencies in Great Britain. In Great Britain, they argon getting paid to do a tu ne, they would want to do the Job well and In a timely manner.In the U. S. , they not getting paid, so why would they rush to get It done? They can tea their time solving things or getting the tests completed. On the aside, the police and prosecutors have opening to, free of charge, all of the services the U. S. abuse labs provide FBI, DEAD, TAFT, US postal lab, to name a few. A strength for Great Britain using private labs is that its not being interfered with by the government, It was paid to do a job, it volition get the Job done.On the down side, this type of system expects to be paid, so if a small area can not pay for the types of help they are In need of, the criminal offence lab will not be able to provide help with the crime investigation. 2. Police investigating an apparent suicide collect the following items at the gibe a tote purportedly written by the victim, a six-shooter thrill very faint finger prints and traces of skin and blood chthonian the victims finge rnails. What wholes of the crime laboratory will examine each piece of evidence?The unit that would examine the note would be the Document Examination Unit. This unit studies the legitimacy of handwriting and typewriting on the documents in question. The revolver will be examined by the Firearms Unit as they are able to detect rest period from firearms, discharged bullets, shotgun shells, cartridge cases, and other types of ammunitions. They examine all firearms and are able to approximate he distance the weapon was fired from the target. The revolver will also also be examined by the Latent fingerprint Unit because it has a very faint fingerprint on it.The biological science unit will examine the traces of blood and skin found under the victims fingernails. This unit is staffed with many biochemists and biologists that are trained to perform DNA indite on body fluids, dried bloodstains as well as skin. Crime scene instead of a patrol officer or research spend a pennyer. car dinal of the advantages of having an evidence assemblage unit demonstrate a crime scene over a patrol officer or a detective is that the evidence collection unit have properly rained staff technicians on the ready 24 hours a day to arrive at a crime scene to collect evidence.Another advantage is that these technicians are trained live and to collect/gather important physical evidence at the crime scene where as a detective or a patrol office may not have such a acuate eye for such things. A third advantage for having evidence collection units process a crime scene is that the technicians are trained to work with all the special lab equipment in order to help process the evidence. This helps them to become experts in their field as they are exposed to the equipment 24 hours a day, having all the supplies and tools for proper evidence collection and packaging which allows for forthcoming examination. . What legal issue was raised on appeal by the exculpation in Carl Spoolings Fl orida murder trial? What court ruling is most applicable to the ending to reject the appeal? Explain. The legal issue that was raised objet dart on appeal was that could the defendant be convicted of murder based on a series of tests designed specifically for this one case because the tests had not yet gained general acceptance across the toxicology profession. The court believed that these tests, though they are new, are important to the case and are admissible and doesnt make the crime of murder any less of a crime.Rule 702 is most relevant, in this case, to the decision to reject the appeal because Rule 702 deals with the admissibility of expert testimony. The testimony from qualified experts (the witness) by skills, training, knowledge, experience, or education, is based on gathered data and/or fitted facts. The testimony must be produced from methods and principles of reliability, and finally, the witness must use and hold back the methods and principles reliably to facts of said case.