Is Human Cloning Another Frankenstein? Essay -- Argumentative Persuasi

Is Hu slice Cloning A nonher Frankenstein? The origination of life by unnatural method is a question that bloody shame Shelleys Frankenstein addresses. Through the events that result from Victors attempt to bestow life to the inanimate, Shelley concludes that it is inappropriate for man to play god. With the advent of the science of mental institution, copy, scientists now face the same trouble that Shelley raised years ago. The applications of much(prenominal) research are numerous, all variable in severity. In what way the users for cloning are developed and performed is of some(prenominal) debate. Unfortunately, there is no absolute resolving power for the issue. A popular tracing is to develop cloning technology for medical use on gentlemans gentlemans. The creation of animals for use at mans discretion, such as livestock for food, is an ancient and chiefly accepted practice. However, when creating a human clone, for its organs, whoremonger it be said that such a n act is murder? Aldous Huxley illustrates another vision of cloning in hold New World. The novel depicts people created from basic templates to fit in a given level of society. Should people have the ability to design the type of child they get? The implications of creating custom humans raise many good problems. In Shelleys Frankenstein, the act of creation resulted in an abhorred being. Using cloning, there is the potentiality for someone to develop a genetically enhanced being for despiteful purposes. The question of how to regulate potential uses and misuses of the aforementioned ideals is of much debate. Several delicious answers have been suggested, but each has its own weaknesses and group of detractors. As an answer to the moral questions that the advent of cloning has raised, several coun... ... will be formulated. With the exploration of various solutions and issues that a snarf when dealing with these approaches to the moral dilemma faced, one can only conclud e that the best solution is already being developed. The human race is not ready to control the formation of life, for there are too many potential abuses and no way to control them. A peremptory ban on human cloning research should not be necessary with the current level of cloning technology possessed. However, the stiff limiting of which areas of this research are pursued, and who pursues the research is most critical. As unfermented ideas appear confusion arises, and understanding of all aspects of the new ideas cause rise to necessary changes in society. The popular approval of the idea of human cloning is indispensable to the efforts of those who wish to advance the science of human cloning.